Caribbean Utilities Company’s recent base rate adjustment has understandably caused concern in the community, particularly at a time when many households are already under pressure from higher fuel and living costs. It has also led to commentary suggesting that the current government and URCO have chosen to “allow” this increase. The public deserves a clear explanation of how these increases arise and who put the present arrangements in place.
1. The rate mechanism was created in 2008
CUC’s Transmission and Distribution Licence, granted by the Cayman Islands Government in 2008, includes a legally binding Rate Cap and Adjustment Mechanism (RCAM). This mechanism sets out an automatic formula for annual base rate adjustments based on movements in inflation, using a mix of Cayman and US CPI, excluding food and fuel. It was negotiated and agreed between the government of the day and CUC, and has been applied every year since the licence came into force.
In other words, the framework that produces these annual adjustments is not something devised by the current administration or by URCO. It is a long‑standing contractual arrangement, embedded in a licence granted almost two decades ago.
2. URCO cannot lawfully ignore a licence it has inherited
Under that licence, URCO’s role is limited to verifying the data used in CUC’s RCAM calculation and confirming that the adjustment has been correctly applied under the agreed formula. Once that verification is complete, URCO has no lawful discretion to “block” an adjustment that the licence requires. To do so would be to disregard the licence conditions, invite successful legal challenge and undermine the rule of law.
Regulators must operate within the legal instruments they inherit. Any change to the way electricity rates are set requires amending the licence itself through a lawful process led by the Government and conducted in consultation with CUC.
3. The political history should be acknowledged honestly
It has been suggested that the current government and URCO should explain “why CUC was allowed” to increase its rates. That is a fair question - but it cannot be answered honestly without acknowledging that:
The current government and URCO are therefore not introducing a new policy of rate increases; they are applying an existing licence regime that was established and maintained under previous governments, including the PPM lead administration.
It is entirely legitimate for the Opposition to call for a more coherent long‑term strategy to reduce electricity costs and protect consumers from global fuel shocks. On that point, there is significant common ground. But public debate should be grounded in the reality that:
The RCAM mechanism was created under a previous administration;
4. The way forward
The route is not for the regulator to ignore a binding licence, but to amend that licence and the wider regime in a lawful, transparent and consultative way. URCO has already indicated that, in light of the National Energy Policy, technological change and efficiency imperatives, it believes the time is right to review and update the existing licence regime. That work can only be done in partnership with the support of the government and within the constitutional and legal framework. The current government and, in particular, Hon. Minister Anglin have already signalled support in this area.
In the meantime:
Families and businesses deserve more than convenient amnesia about who agreed to the present arrangements. They deserve a regulator and a government that explain the legal reality clearly, that act within the law, and that work seriously on the structural reforms needed to deliver a more affordable, modern and resilient energy system for the Cayman Islands.